Washington Post redesign

Washington Post redesign

I wasn’t terribly fond of the last redesign of the WP, so I wasn’t expecting much. Overall, I am fairly pleased, however, with the changes to one of my favorite newspapers.

Sunday (old) and Tuesday (new)

Washington Post redesign

Washington Post redesign

The nameplate is a little larger and cleaner looking with the weather moved from the ear to the folio line. Much better. The headline face is cleaner and more interesting visually. There is also an improved use of deck heads for the scanners. Feature heads are centered and italic. News heads remain flush left.

As I had hoped, the body type got a lot of attention, with a larger x-height and a cleaner cut: the old type looks a bit muddy by comparison. I do think it could use a bit more linespacing. I think it is condensed a bit too much, but it really doesn’t seem as squeezed as the old face. Samples at the redesign guide, linked to below.

The Post folks took the opportunity to move a few features around and do some tweaking on their web site as well. I don’t like their columnist sigs, and those little head shots look like WSJ rip-offs, which is too bad. Originality is a better path, even if the WSJ is doing well and looks good, both of which are true.

All in all, I like what the Post did in what is really a minor redesign. I like the typographic changes and they have made it cleaner and lighter without losing the Post personality. The main downer is the WSJ copying.

Here is their PDF that explains the changes. It is worth looking over if you are interested in newspaper design.

Inspired? Let me help you touch up your paper. E-mail me for more information.

Post to Twitter

Related posts:

  1. What works, what doesn't, II
  2. Newspaper design tip: baseline grids
  3. When to redesign
  4. Google Wonder Wheel
  5. Planning a newspaper redesign, Part 1

About the Author